I originally posted this in a private Facebook Group, but one of my real-life friends (I do have a couple) suggested that it deserved a wider audience. So, if you’re reading this for the first time you can thank Dot.
Just a quickie before the Nurse comes to sedate me again, is it just me?
More and more and more over the past 2(?) years I have seen more PCs on the news, soaked in some poor kid’s blood, whose life they have either just saved, or tried to save before the experts arrived. Never in my service did I see, or even hear about, so many fine acts of compassion and giving. Every day there are maybe 2-3 stabbings, frequently fatal, and most of them statistically involve young BAME kids (can I say Black without being witch hunted?). Frequently the first officers on scene are required to, and do, administer emergency First Aid way beyond the Triangular Bandage that I used to struggle with, or the freshly ironed handkerchief. Those magnificent officers will have to go back to the nick, go home, or whatever, quite often literally covered in someone else’s blood, explain to their families, and pacify them, and probably suffer who knows how many sleepless nights because they failed to save that life or are simply haunted by the trauma of what they have just dealt with. Later that night they will turn on the telly box and have some opinionated t**t spout on about how the whole of the Police Service is corrupt and racist and should be ‘defunded’ or the newspaper they pick up will be full of the negative stories, some of which aren’t even news, and devote maybe a column inch to the fantastic life saving that seems to go on on an almost daily basis. Apart from being totally unfair to the magnificent work being done on the streets by our successors, this does nothing more thatn severely dent the already drained morale, savaged by Theresa May, and, now she’s gone, the MSM seem intent on carrying on her ‘good’ work. Well done to all of you still serving. Seriously, you deserve it, and Thank You.
You ARE appreciated, even by the dinosaurs amongst us.
The IOPC made 11 recommendations for the Met, Britain’s biggest force, for reform of its policies. “There is clearly much room for improvement,” it said.
What exactly is this profound statement based on? The answer to that is apparently a mere 5 complaints examined by our friends at the Independent Office for Police Conduct. FIVE, yes 5.
I have absolutely no idea how many complaints the Met receives in a year relating to Stop and Search, never mind how how many get substantiated, but I do know how many Stop/Searches officers from the Met carry out in a year.
To put some context on this alarming revelation from IOPC, let’s look at some other numbers. At this current time there are just under 32,000 (FTE) officers in the Met. These 32,000 officers, between them, carried out a grand total of 303,583 Stop/Searches under all relevant powers in the past 12 months.
32,000 officers have carried out 303,000 Stop/Searches and the IOPC issue their “There is clearly much room for improvement,” statment based on that.
I have no desire to defend unethical or unlawful practices, but really? The IOPC are clearly of the mindset that there are systemic failings at work here. I would say that there are possibly training issues highlighted for a very small number of officers.
To the IOPC I say this. You really do need to up your game. You are making yourselves look petty-minded, vindictive and government puppets. The lurid headlines do nothing but unfairly undermine the confidence of the public in their Police Service, so I will re-write the Guardian’s headline for them, and perhaps you can examine your own policies and when your organisation is 100% without fault and blame you can ask me to examine the situaton again.
Nothing Wrong With 303,578 Stop/Searches in The Met
I have just read the IOPC Press Release. Having done so, I’m not at all surprised by their findings
The IOPC recently completed five investigations involving the stop and search of Black men by MPS officers and reviewed the collective evidence gathered to consider disproportionality, legitimacy and how force was used.
If you pick 5 complaints about Stop/Search on black males and your object is to find ‘Disproportionately’ it should come as no surprise if you find it.
So, having studied these FIVE complaints they came up with ELEVEN recommendations
taking steps to ensure that their officers better understand how their use of stop and search powers impacts individuals from groups that are disproportionately affected by those powers
ensuring there is a structure in place so leaders and supervisors are proactively monitoring and supervising the use of stop and search powers and addressing any concerning trends or patterns/ sharing any identified good practice at; individual, unit or organisational level
taking steps to ensure that assumptions, stereotypes and bias (conscious or unconscious) are not informing or affecting officer’s decision making when carrying out stop and searches, especially when using these powers on people from Black communities
ensuring officers are not relying on the smell of cannabis alone when deciding to stop and search someone and use grounds based upon multiple objective factors
ensuring officers carrying out stop and searches always use the principles of GOWISELY and engage in respectful, meaningful conversations with the persons being stopped
ensuring stop and search training incorporates a section on de-escalation, including the roles of supervisors and colleagues in controlling the situation and providing effective challenge
ensuring officers exercising stop and search powers are ending the encounters once their suspicion has been allayed, in a manner that minimises impact and dissatisfaction, unless there are further genuine and reasonable grounds for continued suspicion
ensuring officers exercising stop and search powers are not using restraint/handcuffs as a matter of routine and are only using these tools when reasonable, proportionate and necessary
amending stop and search records to include a question about whether any kind of force has been used. The records should also state where information about the kind of force will be recorded
ensuring officers are following APP and MPS policy and switching on their body-worn video camera early enough to capture the entirety of a stop and search interaction
supervisors taking a proactive role in monitoring and ensuring compliance with body-worn video APP and MPS policy.
about murders in London. I promised to update it when I had the updated info from the Met, well here it is folks.
My question(s) to the Met;
For the years 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 to date could you please supply the following information
1) The total number of murders reported to the MPS for each of the above years. 2) For each year, the total number of Victims and Suspects that were Male 3) For each year, the total number of Victims and Suspects that were under 21 4) For each year, a breakdown of the ethnic origins of Victims and Suspects (totals, not individual offences). 5) For each of the above years, the total number of offences where the weapon used was a knife or similar.
Are you sitting comfortably? Then I’ll begin.
For 2017-2020 how many murders have there actually been in London?
Reasonably stable, showing a slight increase last year, but seemingly heading for a decrease in 2020, probably an unintended consequence of ‘Lockdown’.
So, who are the victims of these tragedies in London?
Of the total number of Murders reported above, the number of Male victims was as below
It seems that you are disproportionately about 3-4 times more likely to be murdered in London if you are Male, but who are the Murderers, what is the gender bias of those accused of Murder in London? To be fair I only asked them for data relating to Males, completely forgetting that more than one person can be charged with each Murder.
How many of the Victims and Accused were Under 21?
I find that really quite sad, in a significant percentage of Murders in London the Accused and Victims are under 21. Our youths are killing each other. The News Headlines tell us this time and time and time but now we have some long-term stats to demonstrate the reality.
What did they look like? What was the Ethnicity Breakdown of Victims and Accused? A thorny subject, one traditionally avoided by Politician and Senior Police Officers, but here goes anyway (I’m neither)
No explanation of that diagram needed by me really, more Black than White, and then a smaller section of the other reported Ethnicities. What about the Accuseds?
Nothing very different there, Black being the largest sector, followed by White.
From the data presented above it is difficult to come to any other conclusion that Black Youths are Killing Black Youths on the streets of London. That may sound like “Stating the Bleedin’ Obvious” and to a degree it is, but Politicians and Community Leaders need to bite the bullet and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. The Police already know what the problem is and they are doing something about it, but that is not very popular amongst the Black Lives Matter movement. To you I say this, Yes, Black Lives Do Matter, All Lives Matter, but if you want to be taken seriously then you need to stop banging on about Police activity (in particular Stop and Search) and DO SOMETHING about young Black men killing young Black men.
We hear a lot of chatter on the news about Knife crime in London (and elsewhere). How many of these murders were committed using a Knife or Sharp Object as opposed to the numerous other methods one could employ to kill someone?
There you go, quite damning really. AND ALL OF THOSE WEAPONS HAVE BEEN CARRIED THROUGH OUR STRETS and could potentially have been found during a Stop/Search and who knows how many lives could have been saved.
Helpfully(?) the Met pointed me to a different data source that I had not encountered before, the Homicide Dashboard, which has plain stats going back to 2003. How does that look?
So what does this tells us? Not a lot really. The number of Murders in London steadily decreased until 2015 when it started to increase again, but fortunately we have yet to return to the bad old days of 2003. As for Victims and Accuseds, this data does not really change much, just makes the numbers bigger. Afro caribbean and White British being far and away the two largest groups, and Under 25s being significantly more likely to commit a murder, although the average age of Victimshas recently come down considerably.
Taken together, these two datasets really do show the nature and scale of Fatal Violence on the streets of our capital. It is time for ALL of the appropriate bodies to shift the blame from Police etc and onto those ultimately responsible, those that do the killing. Parliament, the Mayor of London, Commissioner Dick and Community Leaders need to work together and invest in the future of our young folk before they kill each other completely.
Just a short post today, and then I’m off to take my meds and lie in a darkened room.
Two athletes that I have never heard of got stopped by some TSG officers apparently due to the manner of driving of the car that they were in. For whatever reason (I wasn’t there) it didn’t go at all well and the two athletes ended up being quite stressed by the whole experience.
As is normal (or maybe compulsory) in these circumatnces, heavily edited footage was circulated on Social Media, but quite why they were filming events before they had even been stopped is a mystery to me.
Eventually they were allowed on their way, and they, together with another former athlete who wsn’t there either, excercised their right to complain across Social Media.
The actions of the officers, the evidence from their Body Worn Video and the footage from Social Media were reviewed by officers from the Met’s Directorate of Professional Standards – TWICE.
Twice they formed the opinion that there had been no Misconduct by the officers. TWICE.
Now we have the situation where Dame Dick has referred the Force (i.e. the officers involved) to the Independent Office for Polce Conduct for an investigation, even though it has twice been decided that the officers did nothing wrong.
IOPC Regional Director Sal Naseem said the IOPC would look at whether the use of stop and search was appropriate and proportionate in line with approved police policies, adding: “We will also investigate if racial profiling or discrimination played a part in the incident.”
Dame Dick, either personally or via another Senior Officer, then offered a grovelling apology to the athletes for the distress and hurt feelings they had endured at the hands of those poor TSG Officers.
Policing WITHOUT FEAR OR FAVOUR is now effectively dead, certainly in London. No matter how professionally, patiently and courteously the officers on the streets conduct their duties, hanging over their head is the prospect of a Senior Officer somewhere saying “Our officers did nothing wrong, but we’re frightfully sorry and we will have them investigated.”
Last night my attention was drawn to this tweet from Norman Brennan.
BREAKING NEWS; This message has just arrived by DM from a very Senior Serving Officer (Confirmed who he/she is) Quote; “Norman Stop & Search in London is 25% Down Since BLM Violence is up 25% with Knife enabled Injuries Going to go Mental” This is from a caring officer in DESPAIR
Are things really that dire in Londinium, and if they are, why?
I must warn you, this is going to get very numbery, and I need to try out my new crayons. Let’s start by having a look at Stop/Search in London over the last 2 years.
So there we see the beginnings of a potential problem, or is it? There has indeed been a fall in the total number of Stop/Searches, in the order of 13,652 fewer (or 31%). BUT, the May figure was in itself a spike and the numbers in June have more or less returned to normal. I have no idea what, specifically, was going on in London during May, but something has caused a spike. Possibly increased ‘Proactivity’ during a period of Lockdown? I don’t know, maybe one of the serving officers can tell me.
There has been a lot of fuss in the media over the past few days about athletes getting stopped and the Met were accused of Racism and Racial Profiling. How do the Stop/Searches over the past 2 years break down?
Well to be fair there have been a few months when the proportion of Black people stopped and searched has gone up, for whatever reason, but for most of the two year period, when one ethnicity gets stopped nore frequently, so do the others. In the very last set of data, June 2020, there were actually1,428 fewer Black people stopped than Whites. Once again, I cannot provide a reason for that, but that is what the stats show. Racially prejudiced or Profiled? I can’t see any evidence to support that accusation.
How do the figures stack up when it comes to Positive Outcomes? i.e. the number of occasions something was found as a result of the Stop and Search? Any racial bias there?
Interpret that any way you want but when one Ethnic Group rises they all rise, when one falls they all reduce. In recent months the total number of Positive Outcomes for Black people stopped has been lower than for White people.
What does the long term pattern over two years show us?
Before I leave Stop/Search and move onto Crimes, for the sake of completeness and transparency, we may as well include age and gender (there are only 2 genders because that all is the Met provide stats for).
Males are far more likely to get Stopped and Searched than Females, and the 15-25 year olds are streets ahead of any other age group. Not surprising I suppose, there isn’t much chance of having sufficient grounds to Stop and Search many 75 year old Grandmas.
Almost at the end now. How have the Knife Crime stats looked over the last two years?
The red/orange line representing the 2 year average, it is plain that Knife crime in London has slowed dramatically in 2020, way below average. However this could be the results of CoronaVirus Lockdowns, increased numbers of Police on the streets or anything else.
Knife Crime with Injury. A separate set of stats, how does that shape up in London?
Once again, below the red/orange Average line at the moment.
In conclusion, looking at the bald statistics and with no current, personal knowledge of what is going on, it would appear that there HAS been a large drop in Stop Search during June, but only dropping back to the current baseline figure. Why the spike in May is currently a mystery. Has this alleged lack of Police activity caused a massive rise in Knife enabled crimes and Injuries caused by Knives? I don’t think that the statistics bear that out at all. There was an increase in both types of Knife Crime in May 2020, but still significantly below the two year average.
Sorry Norman, on the basis of the Met’s published statistics I cannot agree with your Senior Officer.
Whether ANY of this has anything to do with Black Lives Matter I can’t possibly say, but at least we have the cold, dry stats to form an opinion on.
At first I convinced myself that it was OK. Officers were working part time in the 90s, what’s different?
When I read the article I became more and more vexed. Before I go any further I want to make clear that I am fully aware that others can, and will, have different opinions to me. That is absolutely fine. Healthy debate is to be encouraged, and you can’t have a good debate if we all think the same. I shall come back to this later.
The full article can be viewed by clicking on the link above, but contains some real gems
Applicants will select from a range of employment types on their application form (full-time, part-time 24hrs or part-time 16hrs). Candidates are also able to self-select their training preferences at the point of offer of employment.
Upon attesting at Hendon, all officers attend a Certificate of Knowledge in Policing course for eight weeks. Part-time officers will have the option to complete this course on a part-time basis.
Students will then have the option to complete their foundation training full-time, full-time with a four-week break clause at week five, or via a bespoke part-time training offer.
The bespoke part-time offer will see students forming a part-time cohort twice a year, attending a four-day foundation course over a 17-week period that will be delivered between 0900-1700hrs.
The working patterns available are:
– Full time (working 40 hours per week and earning a base salary of £30,372)
– Part-time officers working an average of 24 hours per week or 240 hours over the 10-week cycle (earning a base salary of £18,223)
– Part-time officer working an average of 16 hours per week or 160 hours over the 10-week cycle (earning a base salary of £13,149).
This all sounds very complicated. Full Time is simple, nothing much has changed, but who on earth is going to administer the two Part Time schemes, and how?
My next question is how are the 16 and 24 hour Part Time schemes going to sit alongside Graduate Entry and Police Now? I assume that the Apprenticeship route is completely incompatible.
I also have concerns about who would take up this offer and why. What does the Met stand to gain from this except pegs in holes? I make no apology for being old-school. I joined in an era when The Job always came first. If your individual problems and circumstances could be accommodated they were, informally. The over-riding priority was always the Met. Work/Life Balance was skewed very much one way and the managerial attitude was very much “If you can’t take a joke you shouldn’t have joined.” Thankfully times are a bit more enlightened than that, but I am still of a generation that thought that The Job comes first, the breakup of many marriages. I’m not defending it, I don’t think we should go all the way back there, but The Job is The Job and needs to be done.
How will Duties Offices cover all the essential posts, arrange sufficient numbers of officers for Aid etc when some of those officers are on only 16 hours a week? How does a ‘bespoke Part-Time training offer’ work?
I posted my displeasure with this policy on Twitter and the response was very much divided. Some disagreed with me, and explained how times have changed, whilst others proffered opinions quite similar to my own.
My own, old-fashioned, opinion is that ANY officer should be willing to commit to far more than 16 hours per week. One of the comments included the fact that Part Time working is not new. No it is not, but a 16/24 hour week is definitely new.
As I said at the very beginning, I don’t expect everybody to agree with me, and they haven’t. Obviously I haven’t had this scheme fully explained to,me, but I just don’t see how it is going to work. It should benefit both Met and Recruit, but I have yet to see how the Met will benefit in any meaningful way.
Time to put some meat on the bones and look at DE Detectives in a bit more detail.
I have restricted my interest to the Metropolitan Police who ‘invented’ the scheme. I should point out that there are some anomalies in their data that I don’t begin to understand.
According to data supplied under the FOIA to somebody else, the initial campaign in June 2017 attracted applications from 4,437 people, 2,134 female, 2,290 male plus 1 who preferred not to say.
The ensuing ‘short listing’ saw 2,293 fall by the wayside leaving 1,292 females and 1,198 males still in the process. Only 425 candidates are shown as having failed the initial stage of the process, so I can only assume that they withdrew voluntarily for their own reasons.
Next came a ‘Verbal Reasoning’ stage. Of the candidates still remaining 231 did not complete the process, 111 females and 120 males. Of the candidates who were successful at Verbal Reasoning 1,013 were female and 896 were male, plus 1 who preferred not to say.
The third, and final, stage was an interview.
264 females and 261 males were successful at this final stage, plus 1 who preferred not to say.
That makes a total of 527 successful candidates.
The vast majority of all candidates were in the 20-30 age range.
Compare this to the information that I was supplied by the Met.
Under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act could you please provide me with the following information?
How many so-called Direct Entry Detectives have been recruited?
How many of that number have resigned or been dismissed to date?
271 direct entry detectives were recruited since May 17 (joiners since the scheme was launched)
1 dismissed and 19 resigned
That doesn’t really correspond with the data released to A. N. Other previously unless 50% of the successful applicants went off and did something else instead.
Anyway, nearly 4,500 people applied to be Direct Entry Detectives and either 527 or 271 were successful. I’m not sure what the recruitment campaign and subsequent training would have cost the Met, but I do hope they thought it was worth it. The only positive that I can take from this so far is that males and females were almost equally represented at every stage of the process.
No ethnicity data was revealed either to myself or A. N. Other.
Nicked from Facebook, it is definitely not mine, but the ramifications of Craig Mackey’s actions, or lack of, just rumble on and on, and the smell is not very palatable.
Like many, I made a formal complaint against the behaviour of Craig Mackey. The Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. This individual locked himself in his car as Pc Keith Palmer was stabbed to death by the animal Masood at the gates of the Palace of Westminster. Like many I have just received a reply to that complaint. It has left me slightly uncomfortable.
Apparently according to the Police Reform Act 2002, I do not have standing to make a formal complaint about this matter and therefore they are not recording my correspondence as a complaint about the Acting Commissioner.
The Act specifies who can make a complaint and in what circumstances. Section 12(1) provides that a complaint may be made by the following people:
a. A member of the public who claims the conduct took place in relation to him/her;
b. A member of the public who claims to have been adversely affected by the conduct, even though it did not take place in relation to him/her;
c. A member of the public who claims to have witnessed the conduct;
d. A person acting on behalf of someone who falls within any of the three categories above.
In my opinion my complaint was justified under b and d above.
b. I have been adversely affected by the conduct of Mr Mackey. Also
d. The complaint was lodged on behalf of Pc Keith Palmer
I am also told:
Section 12(5) further provides that:
…a person shall be taken to have witnessed conduct, if, and only if–
(a) He/she acquired their knowledge of that conduct in a manner which would make them a competent witness capable of giving admissible evidence of that conduct in criminal proceedings; or
(b) He/she has in their possession or under their control anything, which would in any such proceedings constitute admissible evidence of that conduct.
In my case I based the reason for my complaint on the evidence, given on oath, by Mr Mackey to the Westminster Inquest. I can only assume that Mr Mackey was telling the truth during these proceedings. Therefore, in my opinion section (a) above is relevant to my complaint.
The truth is, whilst making the complaint, I fully expected it to be kicked into touch. Not because it was not warranted. But because it does not suit either the hierarchy of the Metropolitan Police or the Mayor of London’s Office. Imagine if you would, that instead of Keith it had been some member of some ‘special interest’ group who was chased and murdered whilst a police officer remained locked in his car………..
But the thing that really surprised me is the inclusion of the following:
‘Well, members of the jury, it’s clear from the evidence of Sir Craig that there was, as I say, nothing that he could have done to have stopped Masood. PC Palmer was under attack practically as soon as Sir Craig saw the attacker. What Sir Craig did was sensible and proper and was intended to protect others in the car with him. None of them, as I have said, had any means of protecting themselves or of resisting an attack, and even if he had got out of the car, it is clear from the CCTV evidence that he would not have reached PC Palmer before Masood had inflicted the fatal wound. Indeed, it’s very likely that Masood would have been past the car even if Sir Craig had got out of it. It’s also clear that after Masood had been shot, Sir Craig did not flee the scene: his first instinct was to get out in New Palace Yard, as we saw on the footage when he opened the car door. However, he was told by an officer to leave, and for good reason’.
This statement is the comment made by the Coroner during his summing up at the Inquest. At the time a great many people queried why the Coroner made such an overt defence of Mackey.
It should be remembered that the purpose of an inquest is to answer four questions:
1 Identity of the deceased
2.Place of death
3.Time of death
4. How the deceased came by his/her death
Evidence must be solely for the purpose of answering these questions and no other evidence is admitted. It is not for the inquest to ascertain “how the deceased died” or “in what broad circumstances”, but “how the deceased came by his death”, a more limited question.
The Coroner’s defence of Mackey had no place in the Inquest. There was never any doubt as to who caused it. The complaint against Mackey was in relation to his behaviour, or lack of behaviour, as a police officer at the time. The complaint was very much along the lines of that made in 2015, against several police officers who failed to get out of their patrol car to assist a Tesco security guard with a violent shoplifter. A complaint which led to the justified sacking of one police officer. I can see absolutely no difference between that incident and the issue around Mr Mackey’s behaviour.
But as out of place as the comment was at the Inquest, it is it’s regular appearance in the official responses from the likes of Cressida Dick (Commissioner of Police) and the Mayors Office for Policing and Crime that worries me. It appears that this statement was a deliberately structured ‘key’ designed to aid in the release of Mackey from his predicament. Prepared and pre-empted, in my opinion, even before the end of the Inquest.
The real cancer that is killing the police service resides in the top floors of the Yard and other Police HQs around the land. Yes, there are many Chief Constables and senior officers who still hold true to the traditional values of policing. But they are growing fewer in number. Seeing how the system has rallied around to protect one of its own, many genuinely good senior officers must be tempted to avail themselves of such patronage.
There is corruption in the police. It stinks of politics…….
Just a quick one today, but I’m still Apoplectic, Incandescent and any other crap descriptions I can think of.
Scotland Yard have now issued a statement on the (in)actions of ‘Sir’ Craig Mackey, Acting Commissionaire.
“Neither he [Mackey] nor the two civilian members of police staff he was in the car with during the time of the attack had any protective equipment with them … His initial reaction as a police officer was to get out of the vehicle. However, an operational decision was made with a police officer at the scene that the then acting commissioner should not get out and that he and the two police staff should leave New Palace Yard immediately.
“It was evident that there were officers already present with the necessary skills to neutralise the threat and to administer advanced first aid. At this stage, the full extent of the threat was still unknown.
“Mr Mackey then returned immediately to New Scotland Yard, where he carried out his responsibilities as acting commissioner; namely to lead and coordinate the strategic response across the Metropolitan police to protect London during what was an ongoing terrorist incident.”
My initial reactions to this statement are
When was any Commissioner ever needed to run any operation personally? I don’t care what it was (and it was serious obviously) the Commissioner was not needed in person, although it would have been helpful if he had his official-issue mobile phone with him.
Why the fuck could he not remain on scene and as a warm, loving human being (OK I made that bit up) have comforted a dying officer? He was THERE For Fucks Sake. One of his officers had just been savagely attacked and was dead or dying, with a Tory MP of all people trying to save his life. Did Mackey go out without his First Aid Certificate and humanity as well?
I really need to take a couple of Aspirin and study the transcript armed with my trusty quill and papyrus, but I’m not quite sure how well his recollections fit with the accepted timeline of events, but then I am pretty angry at the moment so my judgement might be clouded.
Off to lie down in a darkened room now.
It has been brought to my notice that many posts and comments regarding Mackey have ‘disappeared’ from Farcebook overnight, so if you have posted or commented you may wish to check it’s still there
Like many of you I noticed that Deputy Commissioner Craig Mackey had been awarded a Knighthood in the New Years Honours List. Like a few of you I actually thought “what the **** did he get that for?”
Now I know the answer. This morning I stumbled upon this
Met Police Deputy Commissioner Craig Mackey has been made a knight for services to policing.
In a citation he is commended for reducing stop and search by 70 per cent while doubling the arrest rate and overseeing a dramatic improvement in the recruitment of officers from ethnic minority backgrounds.
The reason I wrote it, at the time, had naff all to do with (Sir) Craig Mackey, but more to do with a set of Stop and Search statistics issued by the Mayor of London’s office. Nobody is going to offer me a Knighthood so I can’t be arsed to bring the stats up to date but I don’t suppose the current stats are very different to those forming the basis of a Knighthood.
If you look at the above graph, the arrest rate has more than doubled from 8.3% to 19%. Brilliant? No?
Well actually no.
At the beginning of his graph 8.3% of 533,427 people stopped were getting arrested. This means that 44,274 people stopped were getting arrested. Fast Forward to 19% of 160,694 people arrested as a result of “better”, “more intelligence led” application of Stop and Search. It seems like we’re doing SOOOOOOO much better. In reality those figures show that the Met arrested only 30,532 people, almost 33% FEWER
I won’t challenge the 70%, I’ll give him that, but I do think the stats above represent a reduction in Stop and Search of about 70% over the rolling 12 month period. However, a doubling of the arrest rate? No, I’m not having that. 33% fewer people were arrested over the identical period. To state that the arrest rate was doubled is just a cynical manipulation of the stats. Surely the Public at Large would rather have more prisoners in the Custody Suite than juggle with percentages. Smoke and Mirrors.
Stop and Search is Dead, RIP Stop and Search . Theresa May should hang her head in shame, she is personally responsible for this latest trend. Amber Rudd has done nothing, I think literally nothing. I can’t remember her most significant contribution, and NPCC have done little or nothing to challenge Mrs May or her successor on it.
So, ultimately, the Deputy Commissioner was actually awarded a Knighthood for producing an outcome desired by Mrs May, reducing Stop and Search by 70% and reducing clutter in the Custody Suites at the same time, but do not pretend to have doubled the arrest rates.