Last updated on June 6th, 2023 at 07:23 pm
Last updated on June 6th, 2023 at 07:23 pm
Reading Time: 4 minutesI don’t know about you but I’ve absolutely had enough of the sleaze and expenses furore from all parties in our illustrious government, Lords and Commoners alike.
I’m also quite (well extremely actually) fed up with the constant bashing that our public services (and the Police in particular) are taking at the hands of our politicians.
With naughtiness and mischief in mind I let loose an #FOI request to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority asking the following questions;
Since 2008 what is the TOTAL number of MPs who have been investigated for mis-claiming Parliamentary Expenses?
What is the TOTAL number that have been prosecuted?
What is the TOTAL number of MPs who have been asked to pay back expenses previously claimed but not prosecuted?
Quite simple one would think. Oh no.
The reply that I got back was this;
So,apparently they don’t hold any archive material from before May 2010.
Well I bimbled on over to the Compliance Officer’s website as suggested, expecting to be absolutely inundated with data.
I dared to look up the investigations conducted by IPSA’s Compliance Officer.
For 2010 (post May obviously) I found NONE
For 2011 I found 21 in the 3rd Quarter of the year
For 2012 I found NONE.
In addition there are more comprehensive reports on investigations into Valerie Vaz and Nadine Dorries.
Just so that you don’t feel left out and frustrated I will reproduce one of the reports into an investigation chosen at random, you’ll like it;
An excellent write-up to an investigation I’m sure you’ll agree. Yes, the MP did something wrong and claimed money he shouldn’t have but IPSA was at fault so we won’t ask him to pay it back.
I’m not going to pretend that I’ve read every single one of the 21 reports but the 3 or 4 that I have read ALL contained this phrase “that seeking a repayment for this contravention would be neither proportionate nor reasonable“
So it seems to me that IPSA’s Compliance Officer is a bit of a toothless tiger, might give you a nasty suck but that’s about all. Nothing there to instil fear into our trusted politicians.
You can probably imagine, I was not best pleased with the lack of information being provided.
So, undeterred I asked the same questions of the Metropolitan Police.
On this occasion they were happy to supply me with some information;
At Question 1 you ask
Since 2008 what is the TOTAL number of MPs who have been investigated for
mis-claiming Parliamentary Expenses?
The MPS response is:
All MPs were subject to an initial assessment.
16 MPs were then subject to an extended assessment or investigation.
At Question 2 you ask
What is the TOTAL number that have been prosecuted?
The MPS response is:
4 MPs were prosecuted and convicted.
1 MP was prosecuted but deemed unfit to be convicted.
1 MP is the subject to an ongoing prosecution.
At first glance it seems like the MPS investigations were somewhat more thorough than those of the IPSA Compliance officer.
Bottom line is though, there was a huge scandal over Parliamentary ‘Expenses’ which has never really gone away. IPSA’s investigations don’t really justify the name and the Met seems to have as good a job as it can with the information it was provided with. BUT these people are the Law Makers. They have no excuse for breaking the Law. They should, above all people, understand the Law. It is NOT ACCEPTABLE for IPSA to say “It’s our fault, blame us, we’ll take no action’.
This scandal shows no signs of going away. Darwin’s Theory of Evolution holds good. They find other ways to get away with claiming dubious expenses. Just look at the IPSA website and see the kind of claims that are being paid every week as acceptable. Then come back and tell me they don’t have #SNOUTSINTHETROUGH.