Last Updated on September 11, 2012 by RetiredAndAngry
Some of my readers might be suffering from a slightly frail memory, such as myself. Post-It notes around the cave are the order of the day if I’m to remember everything on my To-Do list.
With that in mind I thought I’d re-publish the 9 Principles of Policing as summarised by Sir Richard Mayne the 1st Joint Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police FORCE in 1829. They are very similar to Sir Robert Peel’s 9 principles of Law Enforcement of the same year, in fact I’ve yet to find the difference. Sir Richard Mayne was the longest-serving and youngest Commissioner the Met has ever seen (even younger than @SirIanBlair)
1. To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment.
2. To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfil their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.
3. To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.
4. To recognise always that the extent to which the co-operation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives.
5. To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering to public opinion; but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humour; and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life.
6. To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public co-operation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective.
7. To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
8. To recognise always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary of avenging individuals or the State, and of authoritatively judging guilt and punishing the guilty.
9. To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.
Some of you may think “1829? Long overdue for a reform” and some may think that they are as valid today as they were the day they were penned. One thing is for certain, the country, the government and the Police Service that we have today need to have Principles such as these. Without principles we’re no better than the mob. Some of you may think that #5 is particularly relevant within the context of the debates that are currently raging around the Police Reform instigated by HMG. These 9 principles make us what we are today, how many of the 9 could the average employee of a privately owned company manage to observe?
Answers on a postcard please.